Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
Volume 10, Issue 3 , Pages 124-133, August 2007

Staff attitudes to family presence during resuscitation:

Part A: An interventional study

  • Kerri Holzhauser, RN, B. Health Sc. (Nursing), Nurse Researcher, Adjunct Research Fellow

      Affiliations

    • Southern Area Health Service ED Clinical Network, Queensland Health, Qld, Australia
    • Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
    • Research Centre for Clinical Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia. Tel.: +61 7 3240 7879; fax: +61 7 3240 7583.
  • ,
  • Julie Finucane, OAM, RN, RM, M EmergN, Nurse Unit Manager

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

Received 25 January 2007; received in revised form 7 May 2007; accepted 1 June 2007.

Summary 

Background

In March 2006 results of relatives’ attitudes to family presence during resuscitation were presented in the Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal as part of a 3-year research project examining the relatives and staff attitudes to family presence during resuscitation [Holzhauser K, Finucane J, De Vries SM. Family presence during resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial of the impact of family presence. Aust Emerg Nurs J 2006;8(4):139–47]. This current article presents Part A, the pre–post intervention results of the staff attitudes stage of the study. The aim was to determine if staff attitudes to relatives’ presence in resuscitation changed post-implementation of the intervention. A third article, Part B, will present results regarding staff attitudes immediately post resuscitation.

Methods

This study was undertaken using a pre-test/post-test intervention design using survey methodology. The intervention consisted of a randomised controlled trial of family presence during resuscitation.

Results

Staff felt the advantages to family presence include the ability to get a patient history quickly, the patient and relative appear comfortable with the process and there were positive outcomes to the management of the resuscitation. Minimal disadvantages expressed included the relatives were in the way and staff performance suffered.

Conclusions

Overall, staff felt there were positive aspects for relatives being present during resuscitation. There was a positive change in staff attitudes to relatives’ presence during resuscitation over time.

Keywords: Resuscitation, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Family presence, Staff attitudes

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1574-6267(07)00076-6

doi:10.1016/j.aenj.2007.06.001

Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
Volume 10, Issue 3 , Pages 124-133, August 2007