Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 38-43, May 2009

Mechanical ventilation in Australian emergency departments: Survey of workforce profile, nursing role responsibility, and education

  • L. Rose, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • Lawrence S. Bloomberg Professor in Critical Care Nursing, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Li Ka Shing Institute, St Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Tel.: +1 416 978 3492; fax: +1 416 978 8222.
  • ,
  • M.F. Gerdtz, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing and Social Work, The University of Melbourne, Level 5, 234 Queensberry St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia

Received 16 October 2008; received in revised form 16 December 2008; accepted 16 January 2009.

Summary 

Background

Little empirical data describes emergency nurses’ role in decision-making for ventilation and no Australian standards exist to guide ventilation decision-making in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

Self-administered questionnaire sent to nurse managers of 24 Australian EDs participating in a contemporaneous prospective, observational study of ventilation management.

Results

Survey responses were available from 21/24 EDs (response rate 87.5%) of which 10/21 (47.6%) were categorized as a principal referral centre. All departments reported a 1:1 nurse-to-patient ratio for ventilated patients, for patients requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) nurse-to-patient ratios ranged from 1:1 to 1:3. Nurse managers from 10/21 (48%) EDs reported having guidelines for the management of mechanically ventilated patients; guidelines for management of NIV were more frequently available (13/21, 62%). Nurses independently implemented the majority of ventilator setting changes in some EDs (9/21, 43%). Competency assessment took place prior to un-preceptored care of ventilated patients in 13/21 (62%) EDs.

Conclusions

Australian nurses participate actively in ventilation decisions but guidelines for ventilation decision-making are not always available. Nurse-to-patient ratios for patients receiving invasive ventilation appear consistent; lack of uniformity in ratios for NIV was common. Further work is needed to identify safe staffing levels for patients receiving NIV in the ED.

Keywords: Emergency department, Respiration, Artificial, Mechanical ventilation, Non-invasive ventilation, Decision-making

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1574-6267(09)00033-0

doi:10.1016/j.aenj.2009.01.003

Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 38-43, May 2009