Mechanical ventilation in Australian emergency departments: Survey of workforce profile, nursing role responsibility, and education
Summary
Background
Little empirical data describes emergency nurses’ role in decision-making for ventilation and no Australian standards exist to guide ventilation decision-making in the emergency department (ED).
Methods
Self-administered questionnaire sent to nurse managers of 24 Australian EDs participating in a contemporaneous prospective, observational study of ventilation management.
Results
Survey responses were available from 21/24 EDs (response rate 87.5%) of which 10/21 (47.6%) were categorized as a principal referral centre. All departments reported a 1:1 nurse-to-patient ratio for ventilated patients, for patients requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) nurse-to-patient ratios ranged from 1:1 to 1:3. Nurse managers from 10/21 (48%) EDs reported having guidelines for the management of mechanically ventilated patients; guidelines for management of NIV were more frequently available (13/21, 62%). Nurses independently implemented the majority of ventilator setting changes in some EDs (9/21, 43%). Competency assessment took place prior to un-preceptored care of ventilated patients in 13/21 (62%) EDs.
Conclusions
Australian nurses participate actively in ventilation decisions but guidelines for ventilation decision-making are not always available. Nurse-to-patient ratios for patients receiving invasive ventilation appear consistent; lack of uniformity in ratios for NIV was common. Further work is needed to identify safe staffing levels for patients receiving NIV in the ED.
Keywords: Emergency department, Respiration, Artificial, Mechanical ventilation, Non-invasive ventilation, Decision-making
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S1574-6267(09)00033-0
doi:10.1016/j.aenj.2009.01.003
© 2009 College of Emergency Nursing Australasia Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
